The Interpersonal Implications of Stealing the Glory
35 Pages Posted: 21 Nov 2006
Date Written: September 1, 2006
Abstract
People tend to overestimate their contribution to joint tasks, in part because their own contributions are more memorable than the contributions of their collaborators. We examined some of the interpersonal consequences of this bias. Participants engaged in either a hypothetical (Experiment 2) or real (Experiment 1) cooperative task and learned how their collaborator ostensibly allocated responsibility. We varied how much credit the collaborator took for herself, and also how much credit she gave to the participant, factors confounded in past research. In each experiment, collaborators who stole the glory were seen as less fair, harder to get along with, and less honest than were collaborators who did not. Interestingly, this effect was driven by one's own contribution being underappreciated more than one's collaborator's contribution being overstated. Mediational analyses revealed that the discord could be traced to the attribution of biased responsibility judgments to self-interest on the part of one's collaborator.
Keywords: responsibility, egocentrism, social comparison, social judgment, naive
Suggested Citation: Suggested Citation
Do you have a job opening that you would like to promote on SSRN?
Recommended Papers
-
The Unpacking Effect in Allocations of Responsibility for Group Tasks
By Kenneth Savitsky, Wayne Wight, ...
-
The Costs and Benefits of Undoing Egocentric Responsibility Assessments in Groups
By Eugene M. Caruso, Nicholas Epley, ...
-
The Rational Side of Egocentrism in Social Comparisons
By Justin Kruger, Paul D. Windschitl, ...
-
On the Genesis of Inflated (and Deflated) Judgments of Responsibility: Egocentrism Revisited
By Justin Kruger and Kenneth Savitsky
-
Did I Do that? Group Positioning and Asymmetry in Attributional Bias
By Brian Gunia and Brice Corgnet
-
Why the Parts are Better (or Worse) than the Whole: The Unique-Attributes Hypothesis