On the Linkage between Financial Risk Tolerance and Risk Aversion: Evidence from a Psychometrically-Validated Survey Versus an Online Lottery Choice Experiment
29 Pages Posted: 24 Nov 2006
Date Written: November 22, 2006
Abstract
There are two related literatures on financial risk tolerance (FRT) (based on psychometrically-validated surveys) and risk aversion (based on lottery experiments) that hitherto have not been intersected. Exploring their integration is the primary goal of this paper. Specifically, we follow a two stage process: (1) we obtain FRT scores from a psychometrically-validated survey on a sample of 162 people; and (2) we conduct a battery of lottery choice experiments on the same people. The second stage is primarily distinguished from earlier lottery choice experiments by being online and involving non-student subjects. Moreover, we contrast: real and hypothetical payoffs; low and high stake payoffs; decisions involving gains and losses; and order effects. Our key finding is that the two approaches to analysing decision-making under uncertainty are strongly aligned. We present evidence that this is particularly the case for the female participants in our sample. There is also some evidence that the alignment is strengthened when high stake gambles are employed.
Keywords: Financial Risk Tolerance, Risk Aversion, Psychometric Survey, Online Lottery Choice Experiment
JEL Classification: D81, G19
Suggested Citation: Suggested Citation
Do you have a job opening that you would like to promote on SSRN?
Recommended Papers
-
Deal or No Deal? Decision Making under Risk in a Large-Payoff Game Show
By Thierry Post, Martijn J. Van Den Assem, ...
-
Decision Making Under Risk in Deal or No Deal
By Nicolas De Roos and Yianis Sarafidis
-
Risk Attitudes in Large Stake Gambles: Evidence from a Game Show
By Cary A. Deck, Jungmin Lee, ...
-
Risky Choice and the Relative Size of Stakes
By Guido Baltussen, Thierry Post, ...
-
Models of Stochastic Choice and Decision Theories: Why Both are Important for Analyzing Decisions
-
Testing the Predictions of Decision Theories in a Natural Experiment when Half a Million is at Stake