Nietzsche, Foucault, Scalia
64 Pages Posted: 30 Nov 2006
Date Written: November 1, 2006
This paper explores the narrative strategies of majority and dissenting opinions in Lawrence v. Texas, Romer v. Evans, and Bowers v. Hardwick, all major lesbian/gay civil rights decisions. It demonstrates that the story of U.S. history - increasing protection for individual rights, or decreasing respect for moral and constitutional tradition - explains as much about the legal outcome as the doctrinal arguments that the opinions contain. In particular, it places these opinions into a discussion about the relationship between narrative and identity, individual and national. From this perspective, Justice Antonin Scalia shares with French philosopher Michel Foucault the belief that narrative is closely related to identity, with the important difference that Foucault celebrates the fragility of this connection while Scalia deplores it.
Keywords: narrative, gay, Scalia, Kennedy, Lawrence, Romer, Bowers, civil rights, identity, history
Suggested Citation: Suggested Citation