An Rsvp to Professor Wexler's Warm Tj Invitation: Unable to Join You, Already (Somewhat Similarly) Engaged

58 Pages Posted: 4 Dec 2006 Last revised: 20 Feb 2008

See all articles by Mae C. Quinn

Mae C. Quinn

Pennsylvania State University, Dickinson Law


Professor David Wexler, one of the pioneers of the Therapeutic Jurisprudence (TJ) movement, recently extended a warm invitation to law school clinicians and members of the criminal defense bar to join him in attempting to expand the application of TJ to criminal defense practice. He calls upon these individuals to help contribute to his agenda by explicitly recognizing and promoting a special kind of criminal practitioner, which he calls the TJ criminal lawyer. Wexler suggests that such lawyers would have a far broader role than traditional defense attorneys as they would serve as therapeutic change agents within criminal courts by focusing on and encouraging client rehabilitation.

This article is an RSVP to that invitation. As a clinical professor and former public defender, I argue that Professor Wexler's call to action is not only misguided, but potentially dangerous. In particular, his proposal for creating a new model of criminal defense practice, although well-intended, largely misapprehends the already complex nature of quality and zealous criminal defense work. Moreover, it runs the risk of conflicting with existing legal and ethical standards, displacing long-recognized defense community norms, and undermining the rights of criminal defendants. Thus, despite the warmth with which it was extended, I respectfully decline Professor Wexler's invitation. Rather, as this paper further explains, I plan to continue with my prior (somewhat similar) engagement of providing quality and zealous defense representation to the criminally accused and encouraging my clinic students to do the same.

Keywords: criminal, defense, legal clinic, therapeutic jurisprudence

Suggested Citation

Quinn, Mae C., An Rsvp to Professor Wexler's Warm Tj Invitation: Unable to Join You, Already (Somewhat Similarly) Engaged. Boston College Law Review, Vol. 48, May 2007, NYLS Clinical Research Institute Paper No. 06/07-13, Available at SSRN:

Mae C. Quinn (Contact Author)

Pennsylvania State University, Dickinson Law ( email )

150 S College St
Carlisle, PA 17013
United States

Do you have negative results from your research you’d like to share?

Paper statistics

Abstract Views
PlumX Metrics