67 Pages Posted: 5 Dec 2006
This Article proposes that local governments should be able to decide for themselves how to protect private property, and then be held to that choice as if it were a local constitutional pre-commitment. Specifically, the Article proposes state enabling legislation to create a mechanism for local pre-commitments around the most contested takings and land use issues, like the meaning of public use, the extent of just compensation, the diminution of value that triggers compensation, and others. The resulting local variation in property regimes would allow consumers - homeowners, developers, and any other property owners - to select the property protection they want by choosing where to live and invest. It would also allow local governments to use variation in property protection as a basis for inter-local competition. Implicit in this proposal is a view of property protection as a tool for attracting investment. Given the opportunity, local governments should offer property protection when the costs of that protection - in the form of increased compensation and decreased flexibility - are less than the benefits from increased investment. This cost-benefit calculus will apply differently depending on the characteristics and priorities of particular local governments.
Keywords: Property, Takings, Local Government, Compensation
JEL Classification: K11
Suggested Citation: Suggested Citation
Serkin, Christopher, Local Property Law: Adjusting the Scale of Property Protection. Columbia Law Review, Vol. 107, 2007; Brooklyn Law School, Legal Studies Paper No. 66. Available at SSRN: https://ssrn.com/abstract=949390