Evolutionary Rationality, 'Homo Economicus', and the Foundations of Social Order
Journal of Social and Evolutionary Systems, Vol. 17, Vol. 1, pp. 41-70, 1994
28 Pages Posted: 11 Dec 2006
Abstract
This article elaborates on an alternate general approach to rationality, starting with the Hayekian concept of mind as a complex system of genetically, culturally, and individually created and transmitted rules. "Evolutionary Rationality" is an individualistic alternative to "Homo Economicus" and the conventional concept of utility maximization under constraints. Its main elements are examined by means of an analysis paradoxes in the theory of games, as well as anomalies in the conventional approach that have been uncovered by experimental economics. This yields an approach to rationality in which individuals are "power maximizers," able to synthesize both rational and irrational behaviors in their standard meanings. "Evolutionary rationality" is thus an unity of reason and emotion - a unity which can be restated in evolutionary terms as recognizing the negative adaptive consequences of "Homo economicus" in our species' social context. Such unity of reason and emotion also prevails in cultural evolution. "Social affectivity" is linked to particular patterns of competition for power and the production of public goods within specific societies. Different consequences for the general analysis of social order are sketched, with special attention to the role of groups in the making of society
Keywords: paradoxes and anomalies in game experiments, Hayeks's theory of group selection, power and utility, evolutionary accounts of human behavior, social affectivity and social order, power in society
JEL Classification: B40, C70, Z00
Suggested Citation: Suggested Citation
Do you have a job opening that you would like to promote on SSRN?
Recommended Papers
-
Normative Behavioral Economics
By Nathan Berg
-
Does Society Benefit from Investor Overconfidence in the Ability of Financial Market Experts?
By Nathan Berg and Donald D. Lien
-
As-If Behavioral Economics: Neoclassical Economics in Disguise?
By Nathan Berg and Gerd Gigerenzer
-
Psychology Implies Paternalism? Bounded Rationality May Reduce the Rationale to Regulate Risk-Taking
By Nathan Berg and Gerd Gigerenzer
-
Rational Ignoring with Unbounded Cognitive Capacity
By Nathan Berg and Ulrich Hoffrage
-
Inconsistency Pays?: Time-Inconsistent Subjects and EU Violators Earn More
By Nathan Berg, Catherine C. Eckel, ...
-
By Nathan Berg