Compelling Interest, Forbidden Aim: The Antinomy of Grutter and Gratz

30 Pages Posted: 12 Dec 2006  

Patrick S. Shin

Suffolk University Law School

Abstract

This article explores the tension between the Grutter Court's capacious account of the value of racial diversity, on the one hand, and the Gratz Court's insistence on the constraining mechanism of individualized consideration, on the other. The article examines whether the promotion of diversity as a compelling interest can be reconciled with the requirement of individualized consideration under any coherent principle of equal treatment. The article concludes that the only way this can be done is to interpret the cases as rejecting the proposition that 'racial' diversity represents a compelling governmental interest and as implicitly adopting, instead, the idea that race is at most an information-bearing proxy for diversity conceived in terms of some race-blind modality.

Keywords: Grutter, Gratz, individualized consideration, equal treatment, diversity, affirmative action

Suggested Citation

Shin, Patrick S., Compelling Interest, Forbidden Aim: The Antinomy of Grutter and Gratz. University of Detroit Mercy Law Review, Vol. 82, p. 432, 2005. Available at SSRN: https://ssrn.com/abstract=950757

Patrick S. Shin (Contact Author)

Suffolk University Law School ( email )

120 Tremont Street
Boston, MA 02108-4977
United States
617-573-8182 (Phone)
617-305-3090 (Fax)

Paper statistics

Downloads
53
Rank
307,455
Abstract Views
878