Social Exchange and Common Agency in Organizations
CESifo Working Paper Series No. 2030
Tinbergen Institute Discussion Paper No. 06-111/1
32 Pages Posted: 4 Jan 2007
Date Written: June 2007
Abstract
We study the relation between formal incentives and social exchange in organizations where employees work for several managers and reciprocate a manager's attention with higher effort. To this end we develop a common agency model with two-sided moral hazard. We show that when effort is contractible but attention is not, the first-best can be achieved through granting autonomy of effort choice to employees and giving bonus pay to both managers and employees. When neither effort nor attention are contractible, an 'attention race' arises, as each manager tries to sway the employee's effort his way. While this may result in too much social exchange, the attention race may also be a blessing because it alleviates managers' moral-hazard problem in attention provision. Lastly, we derive the implications of these contract imperfections for optimal organizational design.
Keywords: social exchange, reciprocity, incentive contracts, common agency, organizational design
JEL Classification: D86, J41, M50, M54, M55
Suggested Citation: Suggested Citation
Do you have a job opening that you would like to promote on SSRN?
Recommended Papers
-
Gift Exchange in a Multi-Worker Firm
By Sandra Maximiano, Randolph Sloof, ...
-
Reciprocity and Payment Schemes: When Equality is Unfair
By Johannes Abeler, Steffen Altmann, ...
-
Do Co-Workers' Wages Matter? Theory and Evidence on Wage Secrecy, Wage Compression and Effort
By Gary Charness and Peter Kuhn
-
Social Comparison and Performance: Experimental Evidence on the Fair Wage-Effort Hypothesis
By Simon Gaechter and Christian Thöni
-
The Impact of Social Comparisons on Reciprocity
By Simon Gaechter and Martin Sefton
-
By Emrah Arbak and Laurence Kranich
-
Rotten Kids with Bad Intentions
By Nick Netzer and Armin Schmutzler