Cross-Border Offers of Securities in the EU: The Standard Life Flotation

28 Pages Posted: 14 Jan 2007

See all articles by Eilis Ferran

Eilis Ferran

University of Cambridge - Faculty of Law; European Corporate Governance Institute (ECGI)

Multiple version iconThere are 2 versions of this paper

Date Written: December 15, 2006


This article reviews the use in the flotation of Standard Life plc of the prospectus passport for cross-border offers of securities within the EU that was introduced by the Prospectus Directive (2003). The Standard Life flotation was a major test for the new law on prospectuses and, overall, it came through it well. The prospectus was approved in the UK and the passport mechanism worked smoothly in facilitating the offer of securities into Ireland, Germany and Austria. The Standard Life transaction suggests that national regulatory agencies are willing to make the regime work effectively and to find pragmatic, case-by-case solutions where experience reveals shortcomings in its design. The Committee of European Securities Regulators (CESR) has also played a constructive role.

The article notes that simplification of the passporting regime does not extend as far as civil liability, which remains a complex area. Those contemplating passported share issuance activity within Europe must still take account of multiple, potentially quite divergent, prospectus liability regimes. Jurisdiction and choice of law rules mean that they could be sued in more than one country and liability could be determined under different national laws. The article provides examples of differences between British, Irish and German law on prospectuses that could be relevant to companies that are considering making a passported offer.

This article also considers the role of private enforcement and its interrelationship with public enforcement in the European context. These are particularly hard questions to address from a European perspective because of the nationally fragmented nature of the mechanisms of both public and private enforcement. The article's review of (the lack of) modern British cases on civil liability to investors for prospectus or other disclosures supports the view that levels of private enforcement in Europe are low but the article cautions against attaching too much significance to this finding.

Keywords: securities regulation, prospectuses, disclosure, Europe

JEL Classification: G1, G2, G10, G15, G18, K2, K22, N20

Suggested Citation

Ferran, Eilis, Cross-Border Offers of Securities in the EU: The Standard Life Flotation (December 15, 2006). Available at SSRN: or

Eilis Ferran (Contact Author)

University of Cambridge - Faculty of Law ( email )

10 West Road
Cambridge CB3 9DZ
United Kingdom
+ 44 1223 338335 (Phone)
+ 44 1223 338340 (Fax)

European Corporate Governance Institute (ECGI)

c/o the Royal Academies of Belgium
Rue Ducale 1 Hertogsstraat
1000 Brussels


Do you have a job opening that you would like to promote on SSRN?

Paper statistics

Abstract Views
PlumX Metrics