Is it Time to Wind Up the Securities Act of 1933?

8 Pages Posted: 20 Jan 2007

See all articles by James C. Spindler

James C. Spindler

University of Texas School of Law; McCombs School of Business, University of Texas at Austin

Abstract

The Securities Act of 1933 was once considered a great benefit for investors because of the strict liability it places on firms to truthfully disclose information to investors. But the strict liability provisions are now dissuading firms from communicating useful information for fear that it may inadvertently contain errors or inaccuracies. The resulting silence is no benefit to investors. Strict liability simply makes no sense in today's sophisticated and deep capital markets.

Keywords: securities act, mandatory disclosure rules, hidden costs, SEC, securities and exchange commission, liability, equity-based compensation, performance-based compensation, shareholders, public firms, investors, capital markets, james spindler

JEL Classification: D40, D78, E62, G15, G18, G24, G28,

Suggested Citation

Spindler, James C., Is it Time to Wind Up the Securities Act of 1933?. Regulation, Vol 29, No.4, Winter 2006-2007 pp. 48-55, Available at SSRN: https://ssrn.com/abstract=956900

James C. Spindler (Contact Author)

University of Texas School of Law ( email )

727 East Dean Keeton Street
Austin, TX 78705
United States

McCombs School of Business, University of Texas at Austin ( email )

Austin, TX 78712
United States

Do you have negative results from your research you’d like to share?

Paper statistics

Downloads
106
Abstract Views
976
Rank
463,779
PlumX Metrics