What's Good for the Goose is Not Good for the Gander: Sarbanes-Oxley-Style Nonprofit Reforms
30 Pages Posted: 21 Jan 2007 Last revised: 18 Apr 2012
Abstract
In this article, I contend that these Sarbanes-Oxley-inspired, state, nonprofit reforms, particularly the costly disclosure requirements, will be of little value in the effort to improve ethical nonprofit board governance. The article proceeds as follows. Part II provides a primer on the oversight of nonprofit organizations. Part III reviews the recent Sarbanes-Oxley-like nonprofit reforms introduced in seven states. Part IV contends that the disclosure-focused reforms, which form the bulwark of these acts, will not foster ethical nonprofit board governance. Part V argues that this failure stems from the inappropriate application of a stockholder-based, normative perspective in the nonprofit sector. The article concludes by noting that appropriating a normative construct more tailored to the nonprofit community, namely stakeholder theory, is essential to drafting effective nonprofit sector reforms in the future.
Keywords: Nonprofit, Sarbanes-Oxley, Business Ethics, State Reforms
JEL Classification: L30, L31
Suggested Citation: Suggested Citation
Do you have a job opening that you would like to promote on SSRN?
Recommended Papers
-
Expense Misreporting in Nonprofit Organizations
By Ranjani Krishnan, Michelle Yetman, ...
-
The Causes and Consequences of Internal Control Problems in Nonprofit Organizations
By Christine Petrovits, Catherine Shakespeare, ...
-
Web Disclosure and the Market for Charitable Contributions
By Gregory D. Saxton, Daniel Neely, ...
-
Economic Consequences of Going Concern Audit Opinions in Nonprofit Charitable Organizations
-
Nonprofit Resource Allocation Decisions: A Study of Marginal versus Average Spending
By Karen A. Kitching, Andrea Alston Roberts, ...