Abstract

https://ssrn.com/abstract=959390
 
 

Citations (1)



 
 

Footnotes (39)



 


 



Strict Liability Versus Negligence in Indiana Harbor


Alan O. Sykes


Stanford University - Law School

January 2007

Stanford Law and Economics Olin Working Paper No. 332

Abstract:     
Judge Richard Posner's opinion in Indiana Harbor Belt Railroad Co. v. American Cyanamid Co. offers an economic interpretation of Restatement (Second) of Torts Section 520, which imposes strict liability on actors who conduct abnormally dangerous activities. This paper, which was prepared for a University of Chicago Law Review Symposium in honor of Judge Posner, provides a critique of the opinion and argues that Judge Posner's analysis is at many points unpersuasive. The problem lies in substantial part with the questionable logic of the Restatement criteria for the assignment of strict liability.

Number of Pages in PDF File: 25


Open PDF in Browser Download This Paper

Date posted: January 25, 2007  

Suggested Citation

Sykes, Alan O., Strict Liability Versus Negligence in Indiana Harbor (January 2007). Stanford Law and Economics Olin Working Paper No. 332. Available at SSRN: https://ssrn.com/abstract=959390 or http://dx.doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.959390

Contact Information

Alan O'Neil Sykes (Contact Author)
Stanford University - Law School ( email )
559 Nathan Abbott Way
Stanford, CA 94305-8610
United States

Feedback to SSRN


Paper statistics
Abstract Views: 2,007
Downloads: 270
Download Rank: 86,723
Citations:  1
Footnotes:  39