The Value/Fact Distinction: Coase's Theorem Unifies Normative and Positive Economics

31 Pages Posted: 29 Jan 2007  

Frank J. Tipler

Tulane University

Date Written: January 15, 2007

Abstract

I show that in a true Coasean world - a world with no transaction costs - there would be no disagreement on moral questions. There would be no disagreement on what the appropriate distribution of income should be. There would be no disagreement on the question of capital punishment or abortion. If the government tried to re-distribute income contrary to the no-transaction cost ideal, then in a Coasean world, the beneficiaries would return the money to those from whom it was taken by taxation. Empirical studies of a near-Coasean economy show this predicted return occurring. Thus disagreements on values are actually disagreements over facts. I shall argue that the Coase Theorem itself suggests a moral rule: act to minimize transaction costs.

Keywords: Coase Theorem, nomative economics, positive economics, social norms, information cost, transaction cost, income distribution, value/fact distinction

JEL Classification: A1, A12, A13, D31, K00, K23, K32, L82

Suggested Citation

Tipler, Frank J., The Value/Fact Distinction: Coase's Theorem Unifies Normative and Positive Economics (January 15, 2007). Available at SSRN: https://ssrn.com/abstract=959855 or http://dx.doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.959855

Frank J. Tipler (Contact Author)

Tulane University ( email )

6823 St Charles Ave
New Orleans, LA 70118
United States

Register to save articles to
your library

Register

Paper statistics

Downloads
1,093
rank
17,028
Abstract Views
4,750
PlumX