Abolishing GDP

TI Discussion Paper No. 07-019/3

27 Pages Posted: 9 Feb 2007

See all articles by Jeroen C. J. M. van den Bergh

Jeroen C. J. M. van den Bergh

VU University Amsterdam - Department of Spatial Economics

Date Written: February 2007


Expectations and information about the growth of GDP per capita have a large influence on decisions made by private and public economic agents. It will be argued here that GDP (per capita) is far from a robust indicator of social welfare, and that its use as such must be regarded as a serious form of market and government failure. This article presents an update on the most important criticisms of GDP as an indicator of social welfare and economic progress. It further examines the nature and extent of the impact of GDP information on the economy, revisits the customary arguments in favour of the GDP indicator, and critically evaluates proposed alternatives to GDP. The main conclusion is that it is rational to dismiss GDP as an indicator to monitor economic progress and to guide public policy. As is clarified, this conclusion does not imply a plea against growth, innovation or national accounting.

Keywords: Distribution, externalities, genuine savings, happiness, HDI, informal sector, ISEW, status goods

JEL Classification: D31, D63, E01, I31, O15

Suggested Citation

van den Bergh, Jeroen C.J.M., Abolishing GDP (February 2007). TI Discussion Paper No. 07-019/3, Available at SSRN: https://ssrn.com/abstract=962343 or http://dx.doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.962343

Jeroen C.J.M. Van den Bergh (Contact Author)

VU University Amsterdam - Department of Spatial Economics ( email )

De Boelelaan 1105
Faculty of Economics and Econometrics
1081HV Amsterdam

Do you have a job opening that you would like to promote on SSRN?

Paper statistics

Abstract Views
PlumX Metrics