23 Pages Posted: 10 Dec 2008 Last revised: 12 Mar 2013
Date Written: February 11, 2007
The U.S. patent system has been the subject of three recent, generally critical, studies. One, particularly uncomplimentary, primarily faults a changed source of funds for patent examination and creation of a court that, aside from the Supreme Court, has exclusive jurisdiction to consider patent appeals, both administrative and judicial. This paper explains why neither criticism is well taken. It also analyzes reactions of the U.S. Congress and Supreme Court to allegedly new problems caused by so-called patent thickets and patent trolls.
Keywords: innovation, patent critics, patent reform, invalid patents, patent examination cost, patent litigation cost, patent courts, comparative roles of judge and juror, patent infringement, patent remedies, patent thicket, patent troll, doctrine of equivalents, obviousness
JEL Classification: O31, O38
Suggested Citation: Suggested Citation
Field, Thomas G., Patent Systems: More Easily Faulted than Fixed (February 11, 2007). Available at SSRN: https://ssrn.com/abstract=962561