Clarifying the Curative Admissibility Doctrine: Using the Principles of Forfeiture and Deterrence to Shape the Relief for an Opponent's Evidentiary Misconduct

22 Pages Posted: 14 Feb 2007

See all articles by Edward J. Imwinkelried

Edward J. Imwinkelried

University of California, Davis - School of Law

Abstract

The purpose of this article is to redefine the scope of the curative admissibility doctrine. To do so, the article relies on two basic principles: forfeiture drawn from criminal procedure jurisprudence and deterrence borrowed from legal ethics. The first part of the article presents the policy proposal for invoking those two principles to reshape curative admissibility. The second part of the article demonstrates that this proposal can be implemented without amending the Federal Rules of Evidence. At first blush, some might question the propriety of using an evidentiary doctrine to deter legal ethics violations; but on closer scrutiny, in this narrow context pressing evidentiary doctrine into the service of legal ethics is perfectly legitimate. This use of evidentiary doctrine to enforce legal ethical norms might appear to be at odds with Federal Rule 402's general mandate that all logically relevant evidence be admitted. However, Rule 402 must be construed in light of Rule 102. The courts have rarely interpreted Rule 102, but this article argues that Rule 102 ought to be construed as authorizing the proposed version of the curative admissibility doctrine.

Suggested Citation

Imwinkelried, Edward J., Clarifying the Curative Admissibility Doctrine: Using the Principles of Forfeiture and Deterrence to Shape the Relief for an Opponent's Evidentiary Misconduct. Fordham Law Review, Forthcoming; UC Davis Legal Studies Research Paper No. 98. Available at SSRN: https://ssrn.com/abstract=962934

Edward J. Imwinkelried (Contact Author)

University of California, Davis - School of Law ( email )

Martin Luther King, Jr. Hall
Davis, CA CA 95616-5201
United States

Register to save articles to
your library

Register

Paper statistics

Downloads
58
Abstract Views
951
rank
366,084
PlumX Metrics