Download this Paper Open PDF in Browser

'Misconvictions', Science, and the Ministers of Justice

42 Pages Posted: 23 Feb 2007 Last revised: 2 Feb 2012

Jane Campbell Moriarty

Duquesne University - School of Law


This article provides a new perspective on wrongful convictions - what I term misconvictions. Focusing on the intersection of ethics and expert evidence in criminal cases, the article specifically considers the role of judges and prosecutors, collectively referred to as the ministers of justice. The article has a dual focus: first, to explain the forensic science concerns that contribute to misconvictions; and second, to contemplate the ethical roles that the ministers of justice have in creating misconvictions by their management of expert evidence. In addition to explaining how problematic forensic science can contribute to wrongful convictions, the article details the ethical concerns of prosecutorial and judicial acts and omissions. The article concludes with some suggested changes of a legal and ethical nature that might help reduce the rate of misconvictions.

Keywords: criminal law, prosecutor, expert evidence, ethics, foresnic science, wrongful convictions

JEL Classification: K1

Suggested Citation

Moriarty, Jane Campbell, 'Misconvictions', Science, and the Ministers of Justice. Nebraska Law Review, Vol. 86, No. 1, 2007; U of Akron Legal Studies Research Paper No. 06-20. Available at SSRN:

Jane C. Moriarty (Contact Author)

Duquesne University - School of Law ( email )

600 Forbes Avenue
Pittsburgh, PA 15282
United States

Paper statistics

Abstract Views