Does the Value of Recommendations Depend on the Level of Optimism? A Country-Based Analysis
33 Pages Posted: 5 Mar 2007 Last revised: 9 Dec 2009
Date Written: 2007
Abstract
This paper analyses the investment value of analysts' consensus recommendations and their changes in eight developed stock markets using equity recommendations from Factset/JCF database, in the period from January 1994 to June 2004. Our results show that analysts are optimistically biased, albeit to a different degree in each country; tending to issue a much higher number of buy than sell recommendations. Overall, investors can obtain risk adjusted abnormal returns by selling stocks that are unfavourably recommended or with a downward revision but not by buying the most favourably recommended stocks or those with an upward revision. However, the credibility investors give to recommendations seems to depend on this optimism bias as the risk adjusted returns of the entries/exits of the favourable category (unfavourable) are only significant in countries with a low (high) level of bias.
Keywords: Financial analysis, Value of analysts' recommendations, Performance evaluation of portfolios
JEL Classification: G10, G14, G20, G24
Suggested Citation: Suggested Citation
Do you have a job opening that you would like to promote on SSRN?
Recommended Papers
-
Can Investors Profit from the Prophets? Consensus Analyst Recommendations and Stock Returns
By Brad M. Barber, Reuven Lehavy, ...
-
Security Analysts' Career Concerns and Herding of Earnings Forecasts
By Jeffrey D. Kubik, Amit Solomon, ...
-
By Patricia Dechow, Amy P. Hutton, ...
-
Analyzing the Analysts: When Do Recommendations Add Value?
By Narasimhan Jegadeesh, Joonghyuk Kim, ...
-
An Empirical Analysis of Analysts' Target Prices: Short Term Informativeness and Long Term Dynamics
By Alon Brav and Reuven Lehavy
-
How Do Analysts Use Their Earnings Forecasts in Generating Stock Recommendations?