Abstract

https://ssrn.com/abstract=969761
 
 

Footnotes (59)



 


 



Rita, Claiborne, and the Courts of Appeals' Attachment to the Sentencing Guidelines


Carissa Byrne Hessick


University of North Carolina (UNC) at Chapel Hill - School of Law

F. Andrew Hessick


University of North Carolina (UNC) at Chapel Hill - School of Law


Federal Sentencing Reporter, Vol. 19, No. 3, 2007

Abstract:     
This article provides a critical assessment of the work of the courts of appeals when conducting reasonableness review after United States v. Booker. It examines the presumption of reasonableness most circuits have afforded to within-Guidelines sentences and the requirement that a variance from the Guidelines be supported by a justification proportionate to the variance.

Number of Pages in PDF File: 18

Keywords: sentencing, appellate review, criminal law


Open PDF in Browser Download This Paper

Date posted: March 11, 2007  

Suggested Citation

Hessick, Carissa Byrne and Hessick, F. Andrew, Rita, Claiborne, and the Courts of Appeals' Attachment to the Sentencing Guidelines. Federal Sentencing Reporter, Vol. 19, No. 3, 2007. Available at SSRN: https://ssrn.com/abstract=969761

Contact Information

Carissa Byrne Hessick (Contact Author)
University of North Carolina (UNC) at Chapel Hill - School of Law ( email )
Van Hecke-Wettach Hall, 160 Ridge Road
CB #3380
Chapel Hill, NC 27599-3380
United States

F. Andrew Hessick
University of North Carolina (UNC) at Chapel Hill - School of Law ( email )
Van Hecke-Wettach Hall, 160 Ridge Road
CB #3380
Chapel Hill, NC 27599-3380
United States

Feedback to SSRN


Paper statistics
Abstract Views: 1,669
Downloads: 118
Download Rank: 188,280
Footnotes:  59