Does One Size Fit All? The Consequences of Switching Markets with Different Regulatory Standards
52 Pages Posted: 21 Mar 2007 Last revised: 15 Mar 2009
Date Written: July 2008
Abstract
As the regulation of public companies has progressively tightened in recent years, many companies have chosen to switch to stock exchanges with lower regulatory requirements. We analyse the consequences of switching for smaller quoted companies, using the unusual regulatory environment in London, which has two markets with different regulatory regimes but the same trading technology. Firms that switch to lighter regulation experience negative announcement returns of approximately 5%. However the initial price reactions are reversed after the actual switch - these firms experience a longer-term upward drift in stock returns, which we relate to improved operating performance.
Keywords: stock markets, listing, regulation, switching
JEL Classification: G14, G30
Suggested Citation: Suggested Citation
Do you have a job opening that you would like to promote on SSRN?
Recommended Papers
-
By Jay R. Ritter, Xiaohui Gao, ...
-
Europe's Second Markets for Small Companies
By Silvio Vismara, Stefano Paleari, ...
-
Completing the Technology Transfer Process: M&As of Science-Based IPOs
By Michele Meoli, Stefano Paleari, ...
-
Exit, Voice, and Reputation: The Evolution of SPACS
By Usha Rodrigues and Mike Stegemoller
-
Economies of Scope and IPO Activity in Europe
By Jay R. Ritter, Andrea Signori, ...
-
The Stock Market Evaluation of IPO-Firm Takeovers
By Thorsten V. Braun, Erik E. Lehmann, ...
-
The Death of the Deal: Are Withdrawn Acquisition Deals Informative of CEO Quality?