Avoiding Tragedy in the Wiki-Commons

23 Pages Posted: 28 Mar 2007

Date Written: March 19, 2007

Abstract

For some reason, thousands of volunteers contribute to Wikipedia, with no expectation of remuneration or direct credit, with the constant risk of their work being altered. As a voluntary public good, it seems that Wikipedia ought to face a problem of non-contribution. Yet, this Article argues that like much of the Open Source Movement, Wikipedia overcomes this problem by locking-in a core group of dedicated volunteers who are motivated by a desire to join and gain status within the Wikipedia community.

Yet, undesirable contribution is just as significant a risk to Wikipedia as under-contribution. Bad informational inputs, including vandalism and anti-intellectualism, put the project at risk, because Wikipedia requires a degree of credibility to maintain its lock-in effect. At the same time, Wikipedia is so dependent on the work of its core community, that governance strategies to exclude bad inputs must be delicately undertaken. Therefore, this Article argues that to maximize useful participation, Wikipedia must carefully combat harmful inputs while preserving the zeal of its core-community, as failure to do either may result in tragedy.

Keywords: Wikipedia, public good, volunteer

Suggested Citation

George, Andrew, Avoiding Tragedy in the Wiki-Commons (March 19, 2007). Available at SSRN: https://ssrn.com/abstract=975096 or http://dx.doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.975096

Andrew George (Contact Author)

University of Virginia ( email )

1400 University Ave
Charlottesville, VA 22903
United States

Register to save articles to
your library

Register

Paper statistics

Downloads
200
rank
145,557
Abstract Views
2,899
PlumX Metrics