Reforming Punishment of Financial Reporting Fraud

43 Pages Posted: 27 Mar 2007

Abstract

Present sentencing law in criminal cases of financial reporting fraud is embarrassingly flawed. The problem is urgent given that courts are now regularly sentencing corporate offenders, sometimes (but sometimes not) to extremely punitive terms of imprisonment. Policing of fraud by multiple jurisdictions in a federal system means that principled sentencing law is necessary not only for first-order policy reasons but also for coordination of sanctioning efforts. Proportionality and rationality demand that sentencing law have an agreed scale for measuring cases of financial reporting fraud in relation to each other, a sound methodology for fixing a given case on that scale, and a reasoned calibration of that scale. Current federal law, which controls most such cases and is a focal point for non-federal cases and public debate, is close to sensible on the first score but far off the mark on the other two. In this contribution to a symposium on "Fraud and Federalism," I describe problems in present law and offer relatively uncontroversial reform measures that could substantially improve the law governing sentencing of financial reporting fraud.

Keywords: Criminal Law, Securities Regulation, Corporate Law, Sentencing Law, Fraud

Suggested Citation

Buell, Samuel W., Reforming Punishment of Financial Reporting Fraud. Cardozo Law Review, Vol. 28, p. 1611, 2007; Washington U. School of Law Working Paper No. 07-03-01. Available at SSRN: https://ssrn.com/abstract=975123

Samuel W. Buell (Contact Author)

Duke University School of Law ( email )

210 Science Drive
Box 90362
Durham, NC 27708
United States
919-613-7193 (Phone)

Register to save articles to
your library

Register

Paper statistics

Downloads
257
rank
116,638
Abstract Views
1,824
PlumX Metrics
!

Under construction: SSRN citations while be offline until July when we will launch a brand new and improved citations service, check here for more details.

For more information