Economics and the Design of Patent Systems

16 Pages Posted: 30 Mar 2007

See all articles by Robert M. Hunt

Robert M. Hunt

Consumer Finance Institute, Federal Reserve Bank of Philadelphia

Date Written: March 2007

Abstract

The author uses intuition derived from several of his research papers to make three points. First, in the absence of a common law balancing test, application of uniform patentability criteria favors some industries over others. Policymakers must decide the optimal tradeoff across industries. Second, if patent rights are not closely related to the underlying inventions, more patenting may reduce R&D in industries that are both R&D and patent intensive. Third, for reasons largely unrelated to intellectual property, the U.S. private innovation system has become far more decentralized than it was a generation ago. It is reasonable to inquire whether a patent system that worked well in an era of more centralized innovation functions as well for the more decentralized environment of today.

Keywords: Patents, Nonobviousness, Patent thickets, R&D, Entry barriers

JEL Classification: L1, O31, O34

Suggested Citation

Hunt, Robert M., Economics and the Design of Patent Systems (March 2007). FRB of Philadelphia Working Paper No. 07-6, Available at SSRN: https://ssrn.com/abstract=975483 or http://dx.doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.975483

Robert M. Hunt (Contact Author)

Consumer Finance Institute, Federal Reserve Bank of Philadelphia ( email )

Ten Independence Mall
Philadelphia, PA 19106-1574
United States
215-574-3806 (Phone)
215-574-7101 (Fax)

Do you have negative results from your research you’d like to share?

Paper statistics

Downloads
167
Abstract Views
1,205
Rank
325,133
PlumX Metrics