Subjective Welfare, Isolation and Relative Consumption
44 Pages Posted: 27 Mar 2007
Date Written: December 2006
Abstract
The recent literature has shown that subjective welfare depends on relative income. Attempts to test this relationship in poor countries have yielded conflicting results, suggesting that the relationship is not universal or only applies above a certain income level. We revisit the issue using data from Nepal. We find a relative consumption effect that is robust, strong in magnitude, and consistent across consumption expenditure categories. We find no evidence that poor households - in a relative or absolute sense - care less about relative consumption than more fortunate ones. Households residing far from markets care more - not less - about the consumption level of their neighbors, suggesting that market interaction is not what makes people care about relative consumption. Household heads having migrated out of their birth district still judge the adequacy of their consumption in comparison with households in their district of origin.
Keywords: Subjective well-being, relative deprivation, rivalry
JEL Classification: I31, O12
Suggested Citation: Suggested Citation
Do you have a job opening that you would like to promote on SSRN?
Recommended Papers
-
Who Cares About Relative Deprivation?
By Martin Ravallion and Michael Lokshin
-
Isolation and Subjective Welfare
By Marcel Fafchamps and Forhad Shilpi
-
Isolation and Subjective Welfare: Evidence from South Asia
By Marcel Fafchamps and Forhad Shilpi
-
Robustness of Subjective Welfare Analysis in a Poor Developing Country: Madagascar 2001
By Michael Lokshin, Nithin Umapathi, ...
-
Frame-of-Reference Bias in Subjective Welfare Regressions
By Kathleen Beegle, Kristen Himelein, ...
-
Does Relative Income Matter for the Very Poor? Evidence from Rural Ethiopia
By Alpaslan Akay and Peter Martinsson
-
Poor, or Just Feeling Poor? On Using Subjective Data in Measuring Poverty
-
By Paul Ningaye, Hilaire Nkengfack, ...