Posted: 12 Apr 2007
When the Schiavo case burst onto the national scene, most of us assumed that everyone would see the case as we did. But instead, Schiavo showed that U.S. pluralism was alive and well in decisions about life-sustaining treatment. Schiavo demonstrated, too, that at least some of this pluralism reflects misguided myths about human life and death. In this essay, I examine the myths that Schiavo exposed. One such myth is that death with dignity is easily attainable in modern America, as long as people make living wills. Another myth is that only patients themselves are permitted to take quality of life into account when deciding about life-sustaining interventions. A third myth is that research advances are bringing an end to the difficulties of aging. To examine the myths, I draw on public commentary about Schiavo and on four texts published in 2005, when the case was in the headlines.
Keywords: Life-Sustaining Treatment, Schiavo, Incompetent Patients, Advance Directives, Quality of Life, Disability
Suggested Citation: Suggested Citation
Dresser, Rebecca, Schiavo and Contemporary Myths about Dying. University of Miami Law Review, Vol. 61, p. 401, 2007; Washington U. School of Law Working Paper No. 07-04-03. Available at SSRN: https://ssrn.com/abstract=978967