The Dishonesty of Honest People: A Theory of Self-Concept Maintenance
Journal of Marketing Research, Vol. 45, No. 6, pp. 633-644, 2008
48 Pages Posted: 12 Apr 2007 Last revised: 8 Apr 2011
Date Written: 2008
Abstract
Dishonesty plays a large role in the economy. Causes for (dis)honest behavior seem to be based partially on external rewards, and partially on internal rewards. Here, we investigate how such external and internal rewards work in concert to produce (dis)honesty. We propose and test a theory of self-concept maintenance that allows people to engage to some level in dishonest behavior, thereby benefiting from external benefits of dishonesty, while maintaining their positive view about themselves in terms of being honest individuals. The results show that (1) given the opportunity to engage in beneficial dishonesty, people will engage in such behaviors; (2) the amount of dishonesty is largely insensitive to either the expected external benefits or the costs associated with the deceptive acts; (3) people know about their actions but do not update their self-concepts; (4) causing people to become more aware of their internal standards for honesty decreases their tendency for deception; and (5) increasing the "degrees of freedom" that people have to interpret their actions increases their tendency for deception. We suggest that dishonesty governed by self-concept maintenance is likely to be prevalent in the economy, and understanding it has important implications for designing effective methods to curb dishonesty.
Former working paper titles: “(Dis)Honesty: A Combination of Internal and External Rewards” and "Almost Honest: Internal and External Motives for Honesty")
Keywords: Honesty, Self concept, Cost - Benefit
JEL Classification: D0, D6, K0, M0
Suggested Citation: Suggested Citation
Do you have a job opening that you would like to promote on SSRN?
Recommended Papers
-
Stretching the Truth: Elastic Justification and Motivated Communication of Uncertain Information
-
By Christopher K. Hsee, Frank Yu, ...
-
Dishonesty in Everyday Life and its Policy Implications
By Nina Mazar and Dan Ariely
-
The Endowed Progress Effect: How Artificial Advancement Increases Effort
By Joseph Nunes and Xavier Dreze
-
Do Green Products Make Us Better People?
By Nina Mazar and Chen-bo Zhong
-
Favorable Interpretations of Ambiguity and Unstable Preferences for Fairness
-
By Lisa L. Shu, Francesca Gino, ...
-
The Abundance Effect: Unethical Behavior in the Presence of Wealth
By Francesca Gino and Lamar Pierce
-
Social Value Orientation as a Moral Intuition: Decision-Making in the Dictator Game
By Gert Cornelissen, Siegfried Dewitte, ...
-
The Ethical Mirage: A Temporal Explanation as to Why We Aren't as Ethical as We Think We Are
By Ann E. Tenbrunsel, Kristina A. Diekmann, ...