Creeping Mandatory Arbitration: Is it Just?

46 Pages Posted: 13 Apr 2007 Last revised: 10 Jul 2019

See all articles by Jean R. Sternlight

Jean R. Sternlight

University of Nevada, Las Vegas, William S. Boyd School of Law

Date Written: 2005

Abstract

This Article examines the phenomenon of mandatory binding arbitration, imposed on consumers and employees, and considers whether this type of dispute resolution serves or instead undermines justice. It is fairly easy to attack binding arbitration as unfair, for example pointing to the fact that it undermines rights to jury trial and to proceed in class actions. However, this Article seeks to examine the phenomenon of mandatory binding arbitration from a broader perspective, recognizing that it is inappropriate to assume that justice requires our existing system of litigation, with its class actions and jury trial. The Article concludes that while informal private processes such as arbitration are not inherently unjust, mandatory binding arbitration is problematic for two fundamental reasons. First it is highly problematic to permit the most powerful actors in a society to craft a dispute resolution system that is best for them but not necessarily their opponents or the public at large. Second, principles of justice require that disputants have access to a dispute resolution process that is transparent and open to public scrutiny. While disputants may, in particular situations, chose private processes, it would be improper for a society to establish entirely private dispute resolution processes.

Keywords: mandatory arbitration, arbitration, justice

Suggested Citation

Sternlight, Jean R., Creeping Mandatory Arbitration: Is it Just? (2005). Stanford Law Review, Vol. 57, p. 1631, 2005, Available at SSRN: https://ssrn.com/abstract=979809

Jean R. Sternlight (Contact Author)

University of Nevada, Las Vegas, William S. Boyd School of Law ( email )

4505 South Maryland Parkway
Box 451003
Las Vegas, NV 89154
United States

Do you have a job opening that you would like to promote on SSRN?

Paper statistics

Downloads
431
Abstract Views
2,520
Rank
132,184
PlumX Metrics