Sustainable Energy, Environmental Policy, and States' Rights: Discerning the Energy Future Through the Eye of the Dormant Commerce Clause

165 Pages Posted: 14 Apr 2007

See all articles by Steven Ferrey

Steven Ferrey

Suffolk University Law School

Abstract

This article analyzes the various regulatory incentives for renewable energy development in the various states, and their possible Constitutional shortcomings. Almost half the states have enacted renewable portfolio standards, which create monetized renewable energy credits that are tradable credits for sustainable energy development compliance. About one-third of the states have developed system benefit charges and renewable trust funds to subsidize selected renewable energy projects. Each of these states have defined differently what is a qualifying renewable energy project. Some of the states, to further in-state interests, have established programs that impermissibly violate the Commerce Clause of the Constitution. Others come close to crossing the line of infringing on preempted federal jurisdiction. This article dissects what is and is not permissible in establishing renewable energy programs at the state level. These issues are inherent in various state subsidy mechanisms.

Suggested Citation

Ferrey, Steven, Sustainable Energy, Environmental Policy, and States' Rights: Discerning the Energy Future Through the Eye of the Dormant Commerce Clause. NYU Environmental Law Journal, Vol. 12, p. 507, 2004, Available at SSRN: https://ssrn.com/abstract=980074

Steven Ferrey (Contact Author)

Suffolk University Law School ( email )

120 Tremont Street
Boston, MA 02108-4977
United States

Here is the Coronavirus
related research on SSRN

Paper statistics

Downloads
266
Abstract Views
1,838
rank
127,349
PlumX Metrics