Do Blogs Influence SSRN Downloads? Empirically Testing the Volokh and Slashdot Effects

23 Pages Posted: 16 Apr 2007  

Paul Ohm

Georgetown University Law Center

Date Written: April 14, 2007

Abstract

SSRN's download statistics are criticized for being biased in favor of bloggers. Just how does the supposed bias work, and how strong is it?

This paper reports the results of a small empirical study undertaken in April, 2007. While guest-blogging at the Volokh Conspiracy, the author used a small computer program to collect SSRN Abstract View and Download statistics every fifteen minutes.

The study took on an unexpected dimension when links to some of the author's blog posts appeared in an article on the Slashdot website, one of the most widely-read technology websites. This allowed the author to compare the Volokh Effect with the better known and more often studied Slashdot Effect.

This is a quickly-compiled draft summarizing and analyzing the results.

The odds are very good that the author is collecting data about this abstract page, as well.

Keywords: ssrn, blogs, blogging, empirical law, colorful graphs

Suggested Citation

Ohm, Paul, Do Blogs Influence SSRN Downloads? Empirically Testing the Volokh and Slashdot Effects (April 14, 2007). U of Colorado Law Legal Studies Research Paper No. 07-15. Available at SSRN: https://ssrn.com/abstract=980484 or http://dx.doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.980484

Paul Ohm (Contact Author)

Georgetown University Law Center ( email )

600 New Jersey Avenue, NW
Washington, DC 20001
United States
202-662-9685 (Phone)

Paper statistics

Downloads
234
Rank
103,968
Abstract Views
2,352