Capital Budgeting: NPV v. IRR Controversy, Unmasking Common Assertions

11 Pages Posted: 23 Apr 2007 Last revised: 6 Mar 2018

Date Written: April 19, 2007

Abstract

The conflict between NPV and IRR arises because of misinterpretations that have been made. There is no real conflict. The solution of a polynomial is the subject matter: no more, no less. The NPV-method and the IRR-method are not two measures of investment worth - as it is reported in many textbooks - but just one single method. Moreover, the NPV/IRR-method is plain mathematics and does not pretend to be a ranking device; it cannot be used as such either. Mathematics is yes indeed a tool, but economics can only then be the master if the tool is used properly and the results are interpreted correctly. To help assess the very basics of reckoning investment opportunities as well as to improve the current pedagogy - the latter is so dearly necessary - are the two reasons for writing and publishing this paper.

Keywords: Capital Budgeting, Measures of Investment Worth, NPV, IRR, Investment Opportunities, Ranking Investment Proposals, Reinvestment Assumption

Suggested Citation

Jacobs, Jan F., Capital Budgeting: NPV v. IRR Controversy, Unmasking Common Assertions (April 19, 2007). Available at SSRN: https://ssrn.com/abstract=981382 or http://dx.doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.981382

Jan F. Jacobs (Contact Author)

Independent ( email )

Beethovenlaan 36
Enschede, Overijssel 7522 HJ
Netherlands

Here is the Coronavirus
related research on SSRN

Paper statistics

Downloads
2,001
Abstract Views
11,667
rank
8,673
PlumX Metrics