Tacit Collusion, Firm Asymmetries and Numbers: Evidence from EC Merger Cases
CCP Working Paper No. 07-7
38 Pages Posted: 25 Apr 2007
Date Written: April 2007
Abstract
The purpose of this paper is to identify empirically the implicit structural model, especially the roles of size asymmetries and concentration, used by the European Commission to identify mergers with coordinated effects (i.e. collective dominance). Apart from its obvious policy-relevance, the paper is designed to shed empirical light on the conditions under which tacit collusion is most likely. We construct a database relating to 62 candidate mergers and find that, in the eyes of the Commission, tacit collusion in this context virtually never involves more than two firms and requires close symmetry in the market shares of the two firms.
Keywords: Tacit collusion, collective dominance, coordinated effects, European mergers, asymmetries
JEL Classification: L13, L41
Suggested Citation: Suggested Citation
Do you have negative results from your research you’d like to share?
Recommended Papers
-
Bargaining Over Remedies in Merger Regulation
By Bruce Lyons and Andrei Medvedev
-
Early Settlements and Errors in Merger Control
By Bruce Lyons and Luke Garrod
-
Early Settlements and Errors in Merger Control
By Luke Garrod and Bruce Lyons
-
Early Settlements and Errors in Merger Control
By Bruce Lyons and Luke Garrod
-
Merger Remedies at the European Commission: A Multinomial Logit Analysis
By Patrice Bougette and Stéphane Turolla
-
Determinants of the Success of Remedy Offers: Evidence from European Community Mergers
-
An Economic Assessment of EC Merger Control: 1957-2007
By Bruce Lyons
-
Incentive Contracts as Merger Remedies
By Gregory J. Werden, Luke M. Froeb, ...
-
Regulation and EU Merger Control in the Liberalised Electricity Sector