Brain Drain, Fiscal Competition, and Public Education Expenditure
46 Pages Posted: 26 Apr 2007
Date Written: April 2007
Abstract
This paper uses a two-country model with integrated markets for high-skilled labor to analyze the opportunities and incentives for national governments to provide higher education. Countries can differ in productivity, and education is financed through a wage tax, so that brain drain affects the tax base and has agglomeration effects. We study unilateral possibilities for triggering or avoiding brain drain and compare education policies and migration patterns in non-cooperative political equilibria with the consequences of bilateral cooperation between countries. We thereby demonstrate that bilateral coordination tends to increase public education expenditure compared to non-cooperation. At the same time, it aims at preventing migration. This is not necessarily desirable from the point of view of a social planner who takes account of the interests of migrants.
Keywords: brain drain, educational choice, public education policy, locational competition
JEL Classification: F22, H52
Suggested Citation: Suggested Citation
Do you have a job opening that you would like to promote on SSRN?
Recommended Papers
-
Human Capital Investment and Globalization in Extortionary States
By Fredrik Andersson and Kai A. Konrad
-
Globalization and Human Capital Formation
By Fredrik Andersson and Kai A. Konrad
-
Factor Mobility and Fiscal Policy in the EU: Policy Issues and Analytical Approaches
-
Education, Redistribution, and the Threat of Brain Drain
By Alexander Haupt and Eckhard Janeba
-
Privacy, Time Consistent Optimal Labor Income Taxation and Education Policy
-
Public Education in an Integrated Europe: Studying to Migrate and Teaching to Stay?
-
Mobility and the Role of Education as a Commitment Device
By Claudio Thum and Silke Uebelmesser
-
An Economic Rationale for Public Education: The Value of Commitment