35 Pages Posted: 29 Apr 2007
Congress originally conceived of the budget reconciliation process as a minor fallback mechanism for bringing one year's tax and spending policy in line with overall budget targets. Reconciliation has since become central to congressional efforts to reduce the federal budget deficit. This Note argues, however, that reconciliation is limited in its capacity to impel significant budgetary reform. The author demonstrates how, in 1995-96, reconciliation caused repeated breakdowns in governmental budget-making, undermining the entire budget process. The author concludes that the legal, institutional, and political constraints inherent in the reconciliation process will continue to constitute powerful obstacles to congressional efforts to implement sweeping national reform via the annual budget.
Suggested Citation: Suggested Citation
Krishnakumar, Anita S., Reconciliation and the Fiscal Constitution: The Anatomy of the 1995-96 Budget 'Train Wreck'. St. John's Legal Studies Research Paper No. 06-0070; Harvard Journal on Legislation, Vol. 35, p. 589, 1998. Available at SSRN: https://ssrn.com/abstract=983130