How (Not) to Measure Competition
TILEC Discussion Paper No. 2007-014
CentER Discussion Paper Series No. 2007-32
49 Pages Posted: 10 May 2007
There are 2 versions of this paper
How (Not) to Measure Competition
How (Not) to Measure Competition
Date Written: April 2007
Abstract
We introduce a new measure of competition: the elasticity of a firm's profits with respect to its cost level. A higher value of this profit elasticity (PE) signals more intense competition. Using firm-level data we compare PE with the most popular competition measures such as the price cost margin (PCM). We show that PE and PCM are highly correlated on average. However, PCM tends to misrepresent the development of competition over time in markets with few firms and high concentration, i.e. in markets with high policy relevance. So, just when it is needed the most PCM fails whereas PE does not. From this we conclude that PE is a more reliable measure of competition.
Keywords: competition, profit elasticity, measures of competition, concentration, price cost margin, profits
JEL Classification: D43, L13
Suggested Citation: Suggested Citation
Do you have a job opening that you would like to promote on SSRN?
Recommended Papers
-
By Paul Klemperer and Jeremy Bulow
-
A New Way to Measure Competition
By Jan Boone
-
A New Way to Measure Competition
By Jan Boone
-
Market Structure, Scale Economies and Industry Performance
By Rabah Amir
-
A New Approach to Measuring Competition in the Loan Markets of the Euro Area
-
Endogenous Product Differentiation in Credit Markets: What Do Borrowers Pay for?
By Moshe Kim, Eirik Gaard Kristiansen, ...
-
How (Not) to Measure Competition
By Jan Boone, Jan C. Van Ours, ...
-
By Rachel Griffith, Jan Boone, ...
-
Monetary Policy in a Downturn: Are Financial Crises Special?
By Morten L. Bech, Leonardo Gambacorta, ...