Enriching Judicial Independence: Seeking to Improve the Retention Vote Phase of an Appointive Selection System

20 Pages Posted: 11 May 2007 Last revised: 31 Oct 2012

See all articles by John F. Irwin

John F. Irwin

Nebraska Court of Appeals; Creighton University - School of Law

Daniel L. Real

Creighton University - School of Law

Multiple version iconThere are 2 versions of this paper

Date Written: October 30, 2012

Abstract

This article, published in the Fordham Urban Law Journal (Irwin and Real, Enriching Judicial Independence: Seeking To Improve The Retention Vote Phase Of An Appointive Selection System, 34 FDMULJ 453 (2007)), discusses the subjects of judicial selection and judicial independence, focusing on retention votes in appointive selection systems. The article includes a historical look at judicial selection and retention in Nebraska, a discussion of some pervasive problems with retention votes in appointive selection systems, and a discussion of suggestions for improving retention votes and their effectiveness.

Keywords: Judicial Selection, Judicial Independence, Appointive Systems, Retention Votes

JEL Classification: K00, K4, K40, K49

Suggested Citation

Irwin, John F. and Real, Daniel L., Enriching Judicial Independence: Seeking to Improve the Retention Vote Phase of an Appointive Selection System (October 30, 2012). Fordham Urban Law Journal, Vol. 34, p. 453, 2007, Available at SSRN: https://ssrn.com/abstract=985364

John F. Irwin (Contact Author)

Nebraska Court of Appeals

1445 K Street
1213 State Capitol
Lincoln, NE 68509-8910
United States

Creighton University - School of Law ( email )

2500 California Plaza
Omaha, NE 68178
United States

Daniel L. Real

Creighton University - School of Law ( email )

2500 California Plaza
Omaha, NE 68178
United States

Do you have a job opening that you would like to promote on SSRN?

Paper statistics

Downloads
64
Abstract Views
949
Rank
672,624
PlumX Metrics