Chevron's Demise: A Survey of Chevron from Infancy to Senescence

59 Pages Posted: 10 May 2007 Last revised: 19 Jan 2013

See all articles by Linda Jellum

Linda Jellum

University of Idaho College of Law

Abstract

This article explores Chevron's role in statutory interpretation. In Chevron the Supreme Court resolved the question of how much deference courts must give to an agency's interpretation of a statute: first, determine whether Congress had decided the issue; if not, then defer to any reasonable agency interpretation. But Chevron has proved to be less clear, predictable, and simple than originally envisioned. For example, exactly how searching should the inquiry be at the first step? Should a court limit its search to the text of the statute at issue, or should a court look more broadly for Congressional intent? These are different questions. And, more importantly, the answer directly impacts the distribution of lawmaking power among the three branches of government.

This article explores the Court's reformulation of Chevron's first step and ultimately concludes that Chevron's importance is fading: where Chevron's early application knew no bounds, today, Chevron applies less often and is cited by the Court far less frequently. In the end, the Court's reformulation of Chevron's first step has hastened Chevron's demise.

Keywords: Chevron, statutory interpretation, Skidmore, administrative agency

JEL Classification: K23

Suggested Citation

Jellum, Linda, Chevron's Demise: A Survey of Chevron from Infancy to Senescence. Administrative Law Review, Vol. 59, p. 725, 2007, Available at SSRN: https://ssrn.com/abstract=985380

Linda Jellum (Contact Author)

University of Idaho College of Law ( email )

P.O. Box 442321
Moscow, ID 83844-2321
United States

Do you have a job opening that you would like to promote on SSRN?

Paper statistics

Downloads
231
Abstract Views
1,589
rank
185,121
PlumX Metrics