Characteristics, Covariances, and Average Returns: 1929-1997
24 Pages Posted: 12 Aug 1998
There are 2 versions of this paper
Characteristics, Covariances, and Average Returns: 1929-1997
Date Written: February 1999
Abstract
The value premium in U.S. stocks returns is robust. The positive relation between average return and book-to-market equity (BE/ME) is as strong for 1929-63 as for the subsequent period studied in previous papers. Like others, we also find a size premium in stock returns. Small stocks have higher average returns than big stocks. The size premium is, however, weaker and less reliable than the value premium. The relations between average return and firm characteristics (size and BE/ME) are better explained by a three-factor risk model than by the behavioral hypothesis that investor overreaction causes characteristics to be compensated irrespective of risk loadings.
JEL Classification: G12
Suggested Citation: Suggested Citation
Do you have a job opening that you would like to promote on SSRN?
Recommended Papers
-
Evidence on the Characteristics of Cross Sectional Variation in Stock Returns
By Kent D. Daniel and Sheridan Titman
-
Value Versus Growth: The International Evidence
By Eugene F. Fama and Kenneth R. French
-
Data-Snooping Biases in Tests of Financial Asset Pricing Models
By Andrew W. Lo and A. Craig Mackinlay
-
Conditioning Variables and the Cross-Section of Stock Returns
-
Conditioning Variables and the Cross-Section of Stock Returns
-
Risk and Return in an Equilibrium Apt: Application of a New Test Methodology
-
Can Book-to-Market, Size, and Momentum Be Risk Factors that Predict Economic Growth?
By Jim Kyung-soo Liew and Maria Vassalou
-
The Empirical Foundations of the Arbitrage Pricing Theory I: the Empirical Tests
By Bruce N. Lehmann and David M. Modest