Optimal Group Incentives with Social Preferences and Self-Selection

37 Pages Posted: 23 May 2007 Last revised: 11 May 2010

See all articles by Sabrina Teyssier

Sabrina Teyssier

University of Angers - Institute of Economic Theory and Analysis (GATE)

Date Written: April 1, 2007

Abstract

In this paper, we analyze group incentives when a proportion of agents feel in- equity aversion as defined by Fehr and Schmidt (1999). We define a separating equilibrium that explains the co-existence of multiple payment schemes in firms. We show that a tournament provides strong incentives to agents who only care about their own payoff but that it is not efficient when agents are inequity averse. In fact, inequity averse agents are attracted by a revenue-sharing scheme in which the joint production is equally distributed, under the constraint that selfish agents have no incentive to join the revenue sharing organization. If the market is perfectly flexible, this separating equilibrium induces a high effort level for both types of agents. Pareto gains are achieved by offering organizational choice to agents and the optimal contract is thus to propose both payment schemes to agents and to allow them to self-select into the different payment schemes.

Keywords: Incentives, performance pay, revenue sharing, self-selection, social preferences, tournament

JEL Classification: D63, D82, J31, J33, M52

Suggested Citation

Teyssier, Sabrina, Optimal Group Incentives with Social Preferences and Self-Selection (April 1, 2007). Available at SSRN: https://ssrn.com/abstract=988062 or http://dx.doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.988062

Sabrina Teyssier (Contact Author)

University of Angers - Institute of Economic Theory and Analysis (GATE) ( email )

93, chemin des Mouilles
Monnaie et Finance at Lyon
69130 Ecully cedex
France