Three Federalisms

11 Pages Posted: 25 May 2007  

Randy E. Barnett

Georgetown University Law Center

Abstract

Debates over the importance of federalism are often obscured by the fact that there are not one, but three distinct versions of constitutional federalism that have arisen since the Founding: Enumerated Powers Federalism in the Founding era, Fundamental Rights Federalism in the Reconstruction era, and Affirmative State Sovereignty Federalism in the post-New Deal era. In this very short essay, my objective is to reduce confusion about federalism by defining and identifying the origin of each of these different conceptions of federalism. I also suggest that, while Fundamental Rights Federalism significantly qualified Enumerated Powers Federalism, it was not until the New Deal's expansion of federal power that Enumerated Powers Federalism was eviscerated altogether. To preserve some semblance of state discretionary power in the post-New Deal era, the Rehnquist Court developed an ahistorical Affirmative State Sovereignty Federalism that was both under- and over-inclusive of the role of federalism that is warranted by the original meaning of the Constitution as amended.

Keywords: constitution, federalism, states rights, originalism, reconstruction, new deal

Suggested Citation

Barnett, Randy E., Three Federalisms. Symposium on Checks and Balances Today: The Reality of Separation of Powers, Forthcoming; Georgetown Public Law Research Paper No. 988347. Available at SSRN: https://ssrn.com/abstract=988347

Randy E. Barnett (Contact Author)

Georgetown University Law Center ( email )

600 New Jersey Avenue, NW
Washington, DC 20001
United States
202-662-9936 (Phone)

HOME PAGE: http://www.randybarnett.com

Paper statistics

Downloads
565
Rank
36,957
Abstract Views
2,589