WTO Dispute Resolution in Health and Safety Cases

17 Pages Posted: 29 May 2007 Last revised: 23 Mar 2008

Abstract

The Agreement on Sanitary and Phytosanitary Measures (SPS Agreement) aims to find the right equilibrium between safeguarding each WTO Member's interest in protecting its domestic market from products that threaten the life or health of humans, animals or plants and ensuring that these threats are not abusively invoked by individual Members in order to distort international trade patterns.

This Article proposes that the DSB should apply a more deferential standard of review when evaluating: (1) the level of risk a state is prepared to tolerate; (2) scientific data; and (3) the relationship between the measure at issue and the 'risk assessment' that is required by the SPS Agreement. In fact, it is advocated that the WTO Body should refuse to review these types of assessments altogether. It is asserted that the DSB should not evaluate state priorities and is inadequately qualified to make complicated scientific evaluations. Moreover, errors in this field are more costly than in others, in both political and financial terms. Nevertheless, there should still be vigorous review of state conduct in certain other respects, for instance, to determine whether state measures are arbitrary or discriminatory.

Keywords: WTO, SPS, health, safety, trade

JEL Classification: K33

Suggested Citation

Guzman, Andrew T., WTO Dispute Resolution in Health and Safety Cases. UC Berkeley Public Law Research Paper No. 989371. Available at SSRN: https://ssrn.com/abstract=989371 or http://dx.doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.989371

Andrew T. Guzman (Contact Author)

USC Gould School of Law ( email )

699 Exposition Boulevard
Los Angeles, CA 90089
United States

Register to save articles to
your library

Register

Paper statistics

Downloads
342
Abstract Views
1,505
rank
88,647
PlumX Metrics