The Invasion of Sexual Privacy

Ali Khan

Washburn University /Legal Scholar Academy

San Diego Law Review, Vol. 23, 1986

Privacy is a universal value. No government must invade private homes to discover and punish peaceful and consensual behavior between adults, which threatens no tangible state interests. Sexaul privacy protects such a right. This Article does not argue that all forms of sexual behavior practiced in privacy are morally good or that social approval must be accorded to such behaviors. Nor does this Article argue that all sexual relationships deserve equal treatment. But the state's police powers turn odius and constitutionally unacceptable when the state criminalizes intimate relationships conducted within the sacred precincts of privacy. (The analysis in this article, the first to criticize Bowers v. Hardwick (1986), appealed to the US Supreme Court to overrule its holding in the case. In 2003, seventeen years after the publication of this article, the Supreme Court overruled the Hardwick ruling in Lawrence v. Texas, 539 U.S.558. The Court's reasoning in Lawrence v. Texas closely follows the reasoning offered in this Article--but without mentioning the Article.)

Number of Pages in PDF File: 21

Keywords: sexual privacy, intimacy, Bowers, Harwick, lifestyles, equal treatment of sexual relations

Open PDF in Browser Download This Paper

Date posted: June 3, 2007  

Suggested Citation

Khan, Ali, The Invasion of Sexual Privacy. San Diego Law Review, Vol. 23, 1986. Available at SSRN: https://ssrn.com/abstract=989955

Contact Information

Ali Khan (Contact Author)
Washburn University /Legal Scholar Academy ( email )
Topeka, KS 66610
United States
7856701671 (Phone)
HOME PAGE: http://www.legalscholar.org
Feedback to SSRN

Paper statistics
Abstract Views: 5,789
Downloads: 400
Download Rank: 56,037