The Simple Economics of Extortion: Evidence from Trucking in Aceh
59 Pages Posted: 27 Jun 2007 Last revised: 4 Dec 2022
Date Written: June 2007
Abstract
This paper tests whether the behavior of corrupt officials is consistent with standard industrial organization theory. We designed a study in which surveyors accompanied truck drivers on 304 trips along their regular routes in two Indonesian provinces, during which we directly observed over 6,000 illegal payments to traffic police, military officers, and attendants at weigh stations. Using plausibly exogenous changes in the number of police and military checkpoints, we show that market structure affects the level of illegal payments, finding evidence consistent with double-marginalization and hold-up along a chain of vertical monopolies. Furthermore, we document that the illegal nature of these payments does not prevent corrupt officials from extracting additional revenue using complex pricing schemes, including third-degree price discrimination and a menu of two-part tariffs. Our findings illustrate the importance of considering the market structure for bribes when designing anti-corruption policy.
Suggested Citation: Suggested Citation
Do you have a job opening that you would like to promote on SSRN?
Recommended Papers
-
Monitoring Corruption: Evidence from a Field Experiment in Indonesia
-
Who Must Pay Bribes and How Much? Evidence from a Cross-Section of Firms
-
Who Must Pay Bribes and How Much? Evidence from a Cross-Section of Firms
-
Tax Rates and Tax Evasion: Evidence from "Missing Imports" in China
By Raymond J. Fisman and Shang-jin Wei
-
Tax Rates and Tax Evasion: Evidence from 'Missing Imports' in China
By Raymond J. Fisman and Shang-jin Wei
-
The Role of Wages and Auditing During a Crackdown on Corruption in the City of Buenos Aires
-
By Edward L. Glaeser and Raven E. Saks
-
By Edward L. Glaeser and Raven E. Saks
-
By Anand Swamy, Young Lee, ...
-
What Determines Corruption? International Evidence from Micro Data