Efficient Durable Good Pricing and Aftermarket Tie-In Sales
5 Pages Posted: 26 Jun 2007
Abstract
The conditions under which a durable good supplier employs a tying arrangement that binds aftermarket purchases to the original sale was a central issue in the Kodak case. Two competing theories were presented in that case. Importantly, neither of these provides an efficiency-based explanation for the observed behavior. Subsequent theories provide several efficiency-driven motivations for aftermarket tying. None of these, however, rely upon efficient contracting between the buyer and the seller of the durable good. This article demonstrates the conditions under which such a contract will contain an aftermarket tie-in provision.
Suggested Citation: Suggested Citation
Here is the Coronavirus
related research on SSRN
Recommended Papers
-
Competition, Monopoly, and Aftermarkets
By Dennis W. Carlton and Michael Waldman
-
Competition, Monopoly and Aftermarkets
By Michael Waldman and Dennis W. Carlton
-
Durable Goods, Monopoly Maintenance, and Time Inconsistency
By Hodaka Morita and Michael Waldman
-
By Dennis W. Carlton and Michael Waldman
-
The First Principles Approach to Antitrust, Kodak, and Antitrust at the Millennium
-
Accidents, Liability Obligations and Monopolized Markets for Spare Parts: Profits and Social Welfare
By Pio Baake
-
Strategic Capacity Investment Under Hold-Up Threats: The Role of Contract Length and Width
Efficient Durable Good Pricing and Aftermarket Tie-In Sales
This is a Wiley-Blackwell Publishing paper. Wiley-Blackwell Publishing charges $42.00 .
File name: ecin.pdf
Size: 68K
If you wish to purchase the right to make copies of this paper for distribution to others, please select the quantity.
