American Law and Economics Review, Forthcoming
37 Pages Posted: 26 Jun 2007 Last revised: 25 Sep 2015
Date Written: November 30, 2009
This study evaluates the impact of tort reform on private health insurance coverage using the Current Population Survey’s March Demographic Files. Proponents of tort reform argue that reform will reduce medical malpractice insurance costs, damage awards, and costs associated with defensive medicine. If proponents are correct, these cost reductions should increase health insurance coverage. On the other hand, if the prior tort law was functioning well, reform may increase medical costs by reducing doctors’ care-taking or increasing of the use of aggressive treatments. In this case, tort reform could actually decrease insurance coverage by raising healthcare costs. We evaluate the effect of eight common tort reforms on private health insurance coverage between 1981 and 2007. We find that damage caps, collateral source reform, and joint and several liability reform increased health insurance coverage for the most price-sensitive groups (the single-young and the self-employed) between one-half and one percentage point each. Accordingly, we conclude that tort reform may increase insurance coverage rates for price-sensitive groups, but its overall effect on coverage will be small.
Keywords: tort law, health law, health economics, insurance
Suggested Citation: Suggested Citation
Avraham, Ronen and Schanzenbach, Max M., The Impact of Tort Reform on Private Health Insurance Coverage (November 30, 2009). American Law and Economics Review, Forthcoming; U of Texas Law, Law and Econ Research Paper No. 187; Northwestern Public Law Research Paper No. 07-16. Available at SSRN: https://ssrn.com/abstract=995270 or http://dx.doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.995270