Vertical Restraints in the Bromine Cartel: The Role of Distributors in Facilitating Collusion
37 Pages Posted: 27 Jun 2007 Last revised: 21 Aug 2024
Date Written: July 1993
Abstract
From 1885 to 1902 manufacturers and distributors in the American bromine industry cooperated to increase prices and profits. Like many sectors of the American economy at the time, the bromine industry was made up a large number of small manufacturers and a small number of national distributors. The manufacturers agreed to pool their output and sell only to two distributors. The distributors accumulated excess inventories rather than let the market price fall, but then used those inventories as a threat to deter cheating and new entry. Industry participants designed contracts to balance fluctuations in the costs and benefits from cheating. These contracts succeeded in stabilizing collusion until the entry of new, vertically integrated, mass production firm led to its demise.
Suggested Citation: Suggested Citation
Do you have a job opening that you would like to promote on SSRN?
Recommended Papers
-
Price Wars and the Stability of Collusion: A Study of the Pre-World War I Bromine Industry
-
Monopolization by 'Raising Rivals' Costs': The Standard Oil Case
By Elizabeth Granitz and Benjamin Klein
-
International Cartel Enforcement: Lessons from the 1990s
By Simon J. Evenett, Margaret C. Levenstein, ...
-
Autos and the National Industrial Recovery Act: Evidence on Industry Complementarities
By Russell Cooper and John Haltiwanger
-
The Three Types of Collusion: Fixing Prices, Rivals, and Rules
By Robert H. Lande and Howard P. Marvel
-
Selected Economic Analysis at the Antitrust Division: The Year in Review
By Ken Heyer and David S. Sibley