Are People More Risk-Taking in the Presence of the Opposite Sex?
24 Pages Posted: 25 Jun 2007 Last revised: 20 Jul 2012
Date Written: September 26, 2007
Abstract
This paper investigates whether exposure to the opposite sex induces greater risk-taking in both males and females using a probability discounting procedure with hypothetical monetary rewards. Experimental subjects viewed pictures of opposite sex faces; control subjects viewed pictures of cars. Both males and females viewing opposite sex photos displayed a significant increase in risk tolerance, whereas the control subjects exhibited no significant change. Surprisingly, the attractiveness of the photo had no effect; subjects viewing photographs of attractive opposite sex persons displayed similar results as those viewing photographs of unattractive people.
Keywords: risk preferences, probability discounting, experimental economics, behavioral economics, arousal effect
JEL Classification: C91, D81
Suggested Citation: Suggested Citation
Do you have a job opening that you would like to promote on SSRN?
Recommended Papers
-
Toward an Understanding of the Economics of Charity: Evidence from a Field Experiment
By Craig E. Landry, Andreas Lange, ...
-
What's Psychology Worth? A Field Experiment in the Consumer Credit Market
By Marianne Bertrand, Dean S. Karlan, ...
-
What's Psychology Worth? A Field Experiment in the Consumer Credit Market
By Dean Karlin, Marianne Bertrand, ...
-
Does Price Matter in Charitable Giving? Evidence from a Large-Scale Natural Field Experiment
By Dean S. Karlan and John A. List
-
Does Price Matter in Charitable Giving? Evidence from a Large-Scale Natural Field Experiment
By Dean S. Karlan and John A. List
-
Rebates Versus Matching: Does How We Subsidize Charitable Contributions Matter?
-
Charitable Giving and Income Taxation in a Life-Cycle Model: An Analysis of Panel Data
By Gerald Auten, Holger Sieg, ...