Abstract

https://ssrn.com/abstract=997199
 
 

References (79)



 
 

Citations (1)



 


 



From Competition to Competence? Theory and Experiments Regarding Deliberation, Expertise, and Decision Making


Cheryl Boudreau


University of California, Davis

Mathew D. McCubbins


Department of Political Science and Law School, Duke University

June 28, 2007

2nd Annual Conference on Empirical Legal Studies Paper

Abstract:     
Many scholars propose deliberation as a remedy for our uninformed citizenry. Specifically, scholars emphasize that exposing citizens to the views of competing experts and then letting them discuss those views will help citizens to learn about politics and make informed decisions. In this paper, we analyze experimentally the conditions under which competition between experts induces the experts to make truthful statements and enables citizens to improve their decisions. Our results demonstrate that, contrary to our theoretical predictions, competition induces enough truth-telling to allow subjects to achieve modest improvements in their decisions. Then, when we impose even weak institutions (such as small penalties for lying or slim chances of verification) upon the competing experts, we observe dramatic improvements in both the experts' propensity to tell the truth and in subjects' decisions. We find similar improvements when the competing experts are permitted to exchange reasons for why their statements may be correct. Thus, both institutions and the exchange of reasons help competition between experts to function more effectively.

Number of Pages in PDF File: 55

Keywords: deliberation, learning, competition, experts, experiment, competence

JEL Classification: C91, D80, K10, D72


Open PDF in Browser Download This Paper

Date posted: June 29, 2007 ; Last revised: February 15, 2008

Suggested Citation

Boudreau, Cheryl and McCubbins, Mathew D., From Competition to Competence? Theory and Experiments Regarding Deliberation, Expertise, and Decision Making (June 28, 2007). 2nd Annual Conference on Empirical Legal Studies Paper. Available at SSRN: https://ssrn.com/abstract=997199 or http://dx.doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.997199

Contact Information

Cheryl Boudreau (Contact Author)
University of California, Davis ( email )
One Shields Avenue
Davis, CA 95616
United States
Mathew D. McCubbins
Department of Political Science and Law School, Duke University ( email )
210 Science Drive
Box 90362
Durham, NC 27708
United States

Feedback to SSRN


Paper statistics
Abstract Views: 2,036
Downloads: 166
Download Rank: 142,452
References:  79
Citations:  1