Reforming Federal Personal Injury Litigation by Incorporation of the Procedural Innovations of Scotland and Ireland: An Analysis and Proposal

73 Pages Posted: 12 Jul 2007 Last revised: 26 May 2009

Abstract

Federal procedure has embraced the referral of civil cases outside the court system to alternative dispute resolution. This article argues that by utilizing courts to settle cases through civil procedure, courts realize their central role in ensuring the quality of settlements produced through the judicial administration of justice. The purpose of this article is to provide litigants an optional procedure to expeditiously resolve federal personal injury cases. The system proposed in this article incorporates Scottish and Irish civil procedural reforms into a coherent method for judicial officers to declare the settlement value of a personal injury action without referring the case to alternative dispute resolution.

Keywords: Tort, Irish Civil Procedure, Scottish Civil Procedure, US Federal Civil Procedure, Personal Injury

JEL Classification: K00, K10, K13, K33, K41

Suggested Citation

Erskine, Daniel H., Reforming Federal Personal Injury Litigation by Incorporation of the Procedural Innovations of Scotland and Ireland: An Analysis and Proposal. Cardozo Journal of International and Comparative Law (JICL), Vol. 15, No. 1, 2007, Available at SSRN: https://ssrn.com/abstract=997846

Daniel H. Erskine (Contact Author)

Daniel H. Erskine, Esq. ( email )

173 Huguenot Street, Suite 200
New Rochelle, NY 10801
United States
(866) 951-4443 (Phone)
(866) 951-4443 (Fax)

HOME PAGE: http://erskine-law.com

Do you have a job opening that you would like to promote on SSRN?

Paper statistics

Downloads
41
Abstract Views
894
PlumX Metrics