26 Pages Posted: 8 Jul 2007
Why do regulatory authorities scrutinise mergers and acquisitions? The authorities themselves claim to be combating monopoly power and protecting consumers. But the last two decades of empirical research has found little supporting evidence for such motives. An alternative is that M&A regulation is actually designed to protect privileged firms. We provide a test of protectionism by studying whether European regulatory intervention is more likely when European firms are harmed by increased competition. Our findings raise a suspicion of protectionist motivations by the European regulator during the 1990s. The results are robust to many statistical difficulties, including endogeneity between investor valuations and regulatory actions.
Suggested Citation: Suggested Citation
Aktas, Nihat and de Bodt, Eric and Roll, Richard, Is European M&A Regulation Protectionist?. Economic Journal, Vol. 117, No. 522, pp. 1096-1121, July 2007. Available at SSRN: https://ssrn.com/abstract=998153 or http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/j.1468-0297.2007.02068.x
This is a Wiley-Blackwell Publishing paper. Wiley-Blackwell Publishing charges $38.00 .
File name: ecoj.
If you wish to purchase the right to make copies of this paper for distribution to others, please select the quantity.