Sentencing Acquitted Conduct to the Post-Booker Dustbin
46 Pages Posted: 6 Jul 2007 Last revised: 6 Nov 2007
Abstract
Robert Mercado was an alleged member of the Mexican mafia operating in Los Angeles. He was charged, tried by a jury, and subsequently convicted on several counts of drug conspiracy. But Mercado was acquitted of the most serious charges: participation in multiple murders, violent crimes in the aid of racketeering, and assault with a deadly weapon. When the district court judge calculated Mercado's sentence under the Federal Guidelines, however, he obliged the prosecution request to consider Mercado's liability in the offenses for which the jury returned acquittals. As a result - and in spite of the jury's verdict - Mercado's Guidelines sentence increased by seventeen years. The Ninth Circuit later affirmed this sentence increase.
Although judicial consideration of acquitted conduct - conduct for which an offender has been charged and acquitted by a jury - may strike non-lawyers as confusing, the practice is not only quite common, but was specifically sanctioned by the Supreme Court in United States v. Watts in 1997. Ten years later, however, the Court's sentencing jurisprudence is radically changed; beginning with Apprendi v. New Jersey in 2000, and continuing through its recent invalidation of the California state guidelines system in Cunningham v. California, the Court has steadily invalidated modern guidelines sentencing practices as violative of the Sixth Amendment right to a jury trial. In short, the Court has held that guidelines regimes often unconstitutionally transfer a disproportionate amount of fact-finding power from the jury to the judge. This Note argues that judicial consideration of acquitted conduct is one such aspect of guideline sentencing that the Court's recent jurisprudence renders unconstitutional. Consequently, not only is Watts no longer controlling, but so also is the commonplace practice that allows a judge to replace a jury determination of guilt with his own.
Keywords: acquitted conduct, Sixth Amendment, Booker, Watts, sentencing guidelines, Blakely, Apprendi
Suggested Citation: Suggested Citation
Do you have negative results from your research you’d like to share?
Recommended Papers
-
The War within the War on Crime: The Congressional Assault on Judicial Sentencing Discretion
-
The Sentencing Theory Debate: Convergence in Outcomes, Divergence in Reasoning
By Malcolm Thorburn and Allan Manson
-
Appellate Review of Sentencing Policy Decisions after Kimbrough
-
Determining ‘Reasonableness’ Without a Reason? Federal Appellate Review Post-Rita v. United States
-
'If it Suffices to Accuse': United States V. Watts and the Reassessment of Acquittals
-
Judicial Nullification of Juries: Use of Acquitted Conduct at Sentencing
By Eang L. Ngov